The statement is resolved by identifying Minhaj-us-Siraj as the precise match. Minhaj-us-Siraj, author of Tabaqat-i Nasiri, praised Raziyya's qualities but framed her gender as a political obstacle in the thirteenth-century elite order. The distractors need separate rejection: Amir Khusrau belongs to a different institution, context or chronology; Shams-i Siraj Afif does not perform the function described in the stem; and Ziauddin Barani fails the required association. The wording of “Which chronicler discussed Raziyya's ability while objecting that society would not accept a woman sovereign?” is deliberately specific, so the candidate should isolate its operative clue before recalling names. — Minhaj-us-Siraj”, but also remember the factual reason stated above.