Which statement best explains the significance of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact?

It suspended civil disobedience and enabled Congress participation in the Second Round Table Conference. This is the true significance of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact (1931). On the Gandhi-Irwin Pact: it was signed by Mahatma Gandhi and Viceroy Lord Irwin, and in return for Congress's participation in the Second Round Table Conference, the government agreed to release political prisoners who were not convicted of violence. The Gandhi-Irwin Pact belongs to the 1927-1947 phase of India's national movement, and exam setters often pair the Gandhi-Irwin Pact with neighbouring milestones on this timeline to test precise, date-wise recall. The statement "It ended all nationalist activity permanently." is incorrect for the Gandhi-Irwin Pact because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: It suspended civil disobedience and enabled Congress participation in the Second Round Table Conference. The statement "It immediately created a sovereign republic without negotiations." is incorrect for the Gandhi-Irwin Pact because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: It suspended civil disobedience and enabled Congress participation in the Second Round Table Conference. The statement "It was only a local economic measure with no political effect." is incorrect for the Gandhi-Irwin Pact because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: It suspended civil disobedience and enabled Congress participation in the Second Round Table Conference. Competitive exams such as SSC CGL, SSC CHSL, State PSC, and Railway exams frequently test the Gandhi-Irwin Pact of 1931, so keeping the year, the key person, and the outcome linked together in memory helps avoid confusion with nearby events in the national movement timeline.