Which statement best explains the significance of the Quit India Movement?

The Bombay session adopted the resolution and Gandhi gave the call “Do or Die”. This is the true significance of the Quit India Movement (1942). On the Quit India Movement: following the AICC resolution, top Congress leaders including Gandhi were arrested within hours, and the movement then continued for months as a largely leaderless but widespread mass uprising. The Quit India Movement belongs to the 1927-1947 phase of India's national movement, and exam setters often pair the Quit India Movement with neighbouring milestones on this timeline to test precise, date-wise recall. The statement "It was only a local economic measure with no political effect." is incorrect for the Quit India Movement because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: The Bombay session adopted the resolution and Gandhi gave the call “Do or Die”. The statement "It ended all nationalist activity permanently." is incorrect for the Quit India Movement because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: The Bombay session adopted the resolution and Gandhi gave the call “Do or Die”. The statement "It immediately created a sovereign republic without negotiations." is incorrect for the Quit India Movement because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: The Bombay session adopted the resolution and Gandhi gave the call “Do or Die”. Competitive exams such as SSC CGL, SSC CHSL, State PSC, and Railway exams frequently test the Quit India Movement of 1942, so keeping the year, the key person, and the outcome linked together in memory helps avoid confusion with nearby events in the national movement timeline.