Blood Relation Questions and Answers – Page 2

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Nitin is the husband of Rohan's sister Pooja, so Nitin is Rohan's brother-in-law. Thus the path from Nitin to Rohan ends at the relationship Brother-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Nitin the Brother-in-law, not the father, of Rohan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Nitin the Brother-in-law, not the mother, of Rohan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Nitin the Brother-in-law, not the brother, of Rohan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Rohan at the reference point and trace backward through Pooja to Nitin; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Brother-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Kabir is the husband of Mohan's sister Leela, so Kabir is Mohan's brother-in-law. Thus the path from Kabir to Mohan ends at the relationship Brother-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Kabir the Brother-in-law, not the father, of Mohan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Kabir the Brother-in-law, not the mother, of Mohan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Kabir the Brother-in-law, not the brother, of Mohan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Mohan at the reference point and trace backward through Leela to Kabir; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Brother-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Gopal is the husband of Ishaan's sister Heena, so Gopal is Ishaan's brother-in-law. Thus the path from Gopal to Ishaan ends at the relationship Brother-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Gopal the Brother-in-law, not the father, of Ishaan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Gopal the Brother-in-law, not the mother, of Ishaan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Gopal the Brother-in-law, not the brother, of Ishaan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Ishaan at the reference point and trace backward through Heena to Gopal; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Brother-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Dev is the husband of Farhan's sister Esha, so Dev is Farhan's brother-in-law. Thus the path from Dev to Farhan ends at the relationship Brother-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Dev the Brother-in-law, not the father, of Farhan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Dev the Brother-in-law, not the mother, of Farhan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Dev the Brother-in-law, not the brother, of Farhan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Farhan at the reference point and trace backward through Esha to Dev; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Brother-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Aarav is the husband of Chetan's sister Bhavna, so Aarav is Chetan's brother-in-law. Thus the path from Aarav to Chetan ends at the relationship Brother-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Aarav the Brother-in-law, not the father, of Chetan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Aarav the Brother-in-law, not the mother, of Chetan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Aarav the Brother-in-law, not the brother, of Chetan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Chetan at the reference point and trace backward through Bhavna to Aarav; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Brother-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Nitin is the wife of Rohan's brother Pooja, so Nitin is Rohan's sister-in-law. Thus the path from Nitin to Rohan ends at the relationship Sister-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Nitin the Sister-in-law, not the father, of Rohan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Nitin the Sister-in-law, not the mother, of Rohan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Nitin the Sister-in-law, not the brother, of Rohan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Rohan at the reference point and trace backward through Pooja to Nitin; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Sister-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Kabir is the wife of Mohan's brother Leela, so Kabir is Mohan's sister-in-law. Thus the path from Kabir to Mohan ends at the relationship Sister-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Kabir the Sister-in-law, not the father, of Mohan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Kabir the Sister-in-law, not the mother, of Mohan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Kabir the Sister-in-law, not the brother, of Mohan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Mohan at the reference point and trace backward through Leela to Kabir; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Sister-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Gopal is the wife of Ishaan's brother Heena, so Gopal is Ishaan's sister-in-law. Thus the path from Gopal to Ishaan ends at the relationship Sister-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Gopal the Sister-in-law, not the father, of Ishaan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Gopal the Sister-in-law, not the mother, of Ishaan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Gopal the Sister-in-law, not the brother, of Ishaan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Ishaan at the reference point and trace backward through Heena to Gopal; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Sister-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Dev is the wife of Farhan's brother Esha, so Dev is Farhan's sister-in-law. Thus the path from Dev to Farhan ends at the relationship Sister-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Dev the Sister-in-law, not the father, of Farhan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Dev the Sister-in-law, not the mother, of Farhan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Dev the Sister-in-law, not the brother, of Farhan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Farhan at the reference point and trace backward through Esha to Dev; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Sister-in-law.

Translate each statement into a family link and keep generation and gender separate. Aarav is the wife of Chetan's brother Bhavna, so Aarav is Chetan's sister-in-law. Thus the path from Aarav to Chetan ends at the relationship Sister-in-law. Father is incorrect because the proven chain makes Aarav the Sister-in-law, not the father, of Chetan. Mother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Aarav the Sister-in-law, not the mother, of Chetan. Brother is incorrect because the proven chain makes Aarav the Sister-in-law, not the brother, of Chetan. No extra relationship should be assumed beyond the two statements. As a cross-check, place Chetan at the reference point and trace backward through Bhavna to Aarav; the same family structure is recovered without contradiction. Hence the only relationship supported by every statement is Sister-in-law.