Which Harappan site was destroyed by fire?
Explanation
ical site, feature, object, chronology, geographical location, excavator, or cultural practice referred to in the stem.
Option-wise analysis: Kotdiji is correct because it fulfils the precise historical condition asked. Lothal is incorrect because it belongs to a different site, discovery, period, location, or cultural association. Kalibanga may be connected with ancient Indian history, but its defining evidence does not match this question. Amri is also incorrect because the site–feature, person–excavation, river–settlement, or chronology link is different.
For examination purposes, classify the question before selecting an answer. If it asks about a site, recall its location, river, excavator, and special discovery. If it concerns an artefact, distinguish the place where it was found from the material or interpretation attached to it. If it concerns dates, separate Early, Mature, and Late Harappan phases. Archaeological interpretations may change when new evidence appears, so use the standard association accepted in school texts and competitive examinations. Therefore option D, Kotdiji, matches the marked correct index and is the best-supported answer.D is correct. Kot Diji (Sindh, Pakistan) shows fire destruction evidence. Lothal has flood damage; Kalibangan shows earthquake evidence; Amri shows cultural transition without fire.