Missing Number Questions and Answers – Page 4

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and subtract the second number. Verification of Row 1: (7 × 9) - 9 = 54, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (12 × 6) - 6 = 66, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (14 × 8) - 8 = 104. Therefore the missing number is 104, which is option D. The other choices are incorrect: 105, 103 and 112 do not equal (14 × 8) - 8; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and subtract the second number. Verification of Row 1: (6 × 7) - 7 = 35, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (11 × 5) - 5 = 50, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (13 × 6) - 6 = 72. Therefore the missing number is 72, which is option C. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and subtract the second number. Verification of Row 1: (5 × 5) - 5 = 20, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (10 × 4) - 4 = 36, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (12 × 12) - 12 = 132. Therefore the missing number is 132, which is option B. The other choices are incorrect: 133, 131 and 144 do not equal (12 × 12) - 12; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and subtract the second number. Verification of Row 1: (4 × 9) - 9 = 27, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (9 × 3) - 3 = 24, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (11 × 10) - 10 = 100. The other choices are incorrect: 101, 99 and 110 do not equal (11 × 10) - 10; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and subtract the second number. Verification of Row 1: (3 × 7) - 7 = 14, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (8 × 9) - 9 = 63, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (10 × 8) - 8 = 72. Therefore the missing number is 72, which is option D. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and add the first number. Verification of Row 1: (9 × 8) + 9 = 81, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (11 × 4) + 11 = 55, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (13 × 7) + 13 = 104. Therefore the missing number is 104, which is option C. The other choices are incorrect: 105, 103 and 111 do not equal (13 × 7) + 13; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and add the first number. Verification of Row 1: (8 × 6) + 8 = 56, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (10 × 3) + 10 = 40, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (12 × 5) + 12 = 72. Therefore the missing number is 72, which is option B. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and add the first number. Verification of Row 1: (7 × 4) + 7 = 35, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (9 × 9) + 9 = 90, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (11 × 11) + 11 = 132. The other choices are incorrect: 133, 131 and 143 do not equal (11 × 11) + 11; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and add the first number. Verification of Row 1: (6 × 8) + 6 = 54, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (8 × 8) + 8 = 72, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (10 × 9) + 10 = 100. Therefore the missing number is 100, which is option D. The other choices are incorrect: 101, 99 and 109 do not equal (10 × 9) + 10; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Here the rule is to multiply the numbers and add the first number. Verification of Row 1: (5 × 6) + 5 = 35, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: (7 × 7) + 7 = 56, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: (9 × 7) + 9 = 72. Therefore the missing number is 72, which is option C. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.