Missing Number Questions and Answers – Page 5

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 8 × 7 = 56, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 10 × 9 = 90, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 12 × 6 = 72. Therefore the missing number is 72, which is option B. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 7 × 5 = 35, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 9 × 8 = 72, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 11 × 12 = 132. The other choices are incorrect: 133, 131 and 144 do not equal 11 × 12; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 6 × 9 = 54, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 8 × 7 = 56, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 10 × 10 = 100. Therefore the missing number is 100, which is option D. The other choices are incorrect: 101, 99 and 110 do not equal 10 × 10; each would break the rule already verified in both complete rows. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 5 × 7 = 35, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 7 × 6 = 42, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 9 × 8 = 72. Therefore the missing number is 72, which is option C. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 4 × 5 = 20, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 6 × 5 = 30, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 8 × 6 = 48. Therefore the missing number is 48, which is option B. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 7 + 6 = 13, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 9 + 7 = 16, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 11 + 5 = 16. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 6 + 4 = 10, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 8 + 6 = 14, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 10 + 11 = 21. Therefore the missing number is 21, which is option D. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 5 + 8 = 13, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 7 + 5 = 12, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 9 + 9 = 18. Therefore the missing number is 18, which is option C. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 4 + 6 = 10, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 6 + 4 = 10, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 8 + 7 = 15. Therefore the missing number is 15, which is option B. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.

The same positional rule must explain every row. Verification of Row 1: 3 + 4 = 7, exactly matching the given result. Verification of Row 2: 5 + 3 = 8, again matching the stated result, so the rule is consistent rather than a guess. Apply it unchanged to Row 3: 7 + 5 = 12. A valid missing-number solution cannot switch operations only for the final row. Rechecking the first two examples and then independently recalculating the target row confirms the answer.