Which statement best explains the significance of the Simon Commission?

It contained no Indian member and provoked the slogan “Simon Go Back”. This is the true significance of the Simon Commission (1928). On the Simon Commission: the Indian National Congress and other parties boycotted the Commission at every stop it made in India, and the all-party response it triggered led directly to the drafting of the Nehru Report later the same year. The Simon Commission belongs to the 1927-1947 phase of India's national movement, and exam setters often pair the Simon Commission with neighbouring milestones on this timeline to test precise, date-wise recall. The statement "It ended all nationalist activity permanently." is incorrect for the Simon Commission because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: It contained no Indian member and provoked the slogan “Simon Go Back”. The statement "It immediately created a sovereign republic without negotiations." is incorrect for the Simon Commission because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: It contained no Indian member and provoked the slogan “Simon Go Back”. The statement "It was only a local economic measure with no political effect." is incorrect for the Simon Commission because it exaggerates the actual outcome, which was: It contained no Indian member and provoked the slogan “Simon Go Back”. Competitive exams such as SSC CGL, SSC CHSL, State PSC, and Railway exams frequently test the Simon Commission of 1928, so keeping the year, the key person, and the outcome linked together in memory helps avoid confusion with nearby events in the national movement timeline.