Exambodh - Practice Aptitude, Reasoning & GK Questions
Play Quiz
Indian History
easyQ. No. 15816

Which Mesolithic sites have been discussed for early evidence of managed or domesticated animals in India?

Last Updated:

The question focuses on the historical relationship expressed in “Which Mesolithic sites have been discussed for early evidence of managed or domesticated animals in India?”. Its value lies in connecting Bagor and Adamgarh with the relevant chronology, institution, patronage, text, region or administrative function. The alternatives have been kept within a comparable conceptual category so that solving requires evidence-based discrimination rather than superficial recognition. The accompanying bilingual material supplies concise background, clarifies the principal misconception and supports direct, statement-based and elimination-oriented practice without turning the description into a repetition of the answer.

ABagor and Adamgarh
BHarappa and Mohenjodaro
CSarnath and Kushinagar
DTaxila and Pataliputra
Correct Answer: Bagor and AdamgarhYour Answer: A

Explanation

Animal bones from Bagor and Adamgarh have been used in discussions of Mesolithic herding or domestication. Species identification, dating and the distinction between hunting, management and full domestication require caution, so the evidence should be described as debated rather than an unquestioned first event. Bagor and Adamgarh fits that evidence because it matches the specific chronology, agency and function contained in the question. A comparison with the alternatives is useful: Harappa and Mohenjodaro, Sarnath and Kushinagar and Taxila and Pataliputra are genuine historical terms or names, but each belongs to a different office, patron, text, region or sequence. Reading the question as a relationship among person, period, place and institutional purpose prevents that mistake. The compact memory link is therefore Bagor and Adamgarh together with the factual context above, not the isolated option letter.

Important Notes

  • Bagor and Adamgarh is linked to the precise agency, chronology or function stated in the question.
  • The key factual context is: Animal bones from Bagor and Adamgarh have been used in discussions of Mesolithic herding or domestication.
  • Do not confuse it with Harappa and Mohenjodaro, which represents a different historical association.
  • Sarnath and Kushinagar and Taxila and Pataliputra should be checked by period and institutional role.

Related Questions

View All

Test your Prehistoric Period knowledge

Start Topic Test

FAQ

Prehistoric Period FAQs

Common questions and clear answers for this topic.

Which Mesolithic sites have been discussed for early evidence of managed or domesticated animals in India?

Bagor and Adamgarh. Animal bones from Bagor and Adamgarh have been used in discussions of Mesolithic herding or domestication. Species identification, dating and the distinction between hunting, management and full domestication require caution, so the evidence should be described as debated rather than an unquestioned first event.

Which clue establishes Bagor and Adamgarh as the answer?

The decisive clue is the matching chronology, agency and function described in the stem.

What is the principal misconception to avoid?

Do not choose Harappa and Mohenjodaro merely because it belongs to the same broad historical period.

How can this fact be used in a statement-based question?

Verify the person, period and function separately before accepting the complete statement.

Which Mesolithic sites... | Prehistoric Period MCQ | Exambodh